:: About Us :: Facilities :: Trial Presentation :: Animation & Graphics :: Litigation Management :: Legal Video :: Log In ::
 
 

Katz Consulting Group has worked closely with the Court and counsel to provide state-of-the-art courtroom presentation capabilities and secure Internet streaming of the proceedings to interested parties across the state and country.

Click here for a sample clip of our courtroom Internet broadcast.

To learn more about KCG presentation, media and broadcasting services, please contact us at 304.346.1900



In the early morning hours of July 8, 2001, a rainstorm of unprecedented fury swept over the southern portion of West Virginia, dumping in excess of six inches of rain over the region in a little less than eight hours. The widescale flooding that came in the wake of this storm was intense and destructive.

The events of July 8, 2001 gave rise to this litigation, wherein a consolidated group of 4000+ Plaintiffs - represented by several lawfirms - sued 200+ Defendant landowners; coal, oil and gas operators; mining operators; and other parties whose activities are alleged to have exacerbated the damages caused as a result of this storm.

The claims spread across six (6) watershed areas, but a three-judge panel overseeing the litigation has broken the trial into Phases based upon geography (watershed) and questions of causation (Phase I), liability and damages (possible Phase II and III).

The questions to be answered by the jury in the Phase I trial (Oceana and Mullens subwatersheds) currently taking place in Raleigh County are limited to:

1.      Whether each defendant's operations caused a material increase in the rate of surface water runoff that left that area during the July 8, 2001 storrm compared to the amount of runoff that would have happened anyway during the flooding;

2.      Whether the water from the defendant companies' operations caused a material increase in streams overflowing their banks; and

3.      Regardless of the findings in question 1 and 2, above, whether the defendants used their property in a reasonable manner.

Below are articles regarding the ongoing flood litigation:



Beckley Register-H

2/17/2006 - 2001 Flood Brings Litigation to Raleigh

3/02/2006 - Courthouse Continues Working Towards Hearing Flood Litigation

3/14/2006 - Flood Case Gets Underway

3/15/2006 - Land Disturbances Increase Peak Runoff

3/16/2006 - Flood Trial off to Slow Start

3/21/2006 - Second Witness Takes Stand

3/22/2006 - Cross-Examination Reveals Map Error

3/23/2006 - Whistleblower to Testify

3/24/2006 - Spadaro to Testify

3/25/2006 - Modern Marvel - Technology Adds Courtroom Flair

3/27/2006 - Forester: Timbering Doesn't Increase Water Flow

3/28/2006 - Spadaro Points Out Mining Violations

 

The State Journal

3/03/2005 - Flood Cases Finally Going to Trial

6/16/2006 - Flood trial to begin in March, 2006

2/09/2006 - Flood Cases Close to Litigation

3/16/2006 - Flood Litigation gets Underway






Katz Consulting Group/Contact Us